Trump’s Lawyer in Supreme Court Case Authored Texas Abortion Ban
Background on Mitchell and Texas Law
Jonathan Mitchell, former Texas solicitor general, is arguing on behalf of Donald Trump in the Supreme Court case on whether Trump can remain on the ballot despite engaging in insurrection. Mitchell is best known as the architect behind Texas’ draconian abortion ban.
The Texas law offers a $10,000 bounty to anyone who successfully sues someone who “aids and abets” an abortion. This empowers bullies and busybodies to punish those who help women access abortion. Abusers can also use the law to control victims trying to flee a relationship.
Mitchell’s Arguments Markedly Weak
Mitchell’s legal arguments for keeping Trump on the ballot have been criticized as bizarre and weak. He barely engages with the merits of the constitutional question.
Legal experts believe Mitchell is betting the conservative Supreme Court majority will rule based on partisanship rather than the law. His lack of effort shows facts and legal arguments are irrelevant to him and Trump.
True Motive is Controlling Women
Mitchell’s involvement confirms fears Trump will push for a national abortion ban if re-elected. For Mitchell, undermining democracy is just a means to the end of controlling women’s bodies and lives.
Mitchell has also fought against LGBTQ rights, health care access, and contraception. He opposes the right to private sexual conduct.Supreme Court Case
Conclusion: Fascist Threat to Democracy {Supreme Court case}
Mitchell and Trump’s disdain for democracy and the rule of law underscore the fascist threat they pose. The GOP supports them because shared hunger for unchecked power matters more than facts, law, or voters. Defeating their authoritarian agenda requires protecting America’s democratic institutions and processes.
